Abstract
Overtreatment of prostate cancer has become evident as studies comparing radical prostatectomy vs watchful waiting have shown that radical treatment benefits only a proportion of patients. Active surveillance was introduced as a management option for prostate cancer at low-risk of progression with the aim to closely observe for disease progression or change of tumour characteristics and offer active treatment if and when necessary. Active surveillance has been reserved for patients with Gleason 6 localised disease and low PSA; however, selection criteria may be widened as intermediate-term outcomes demonstrate excellent safety, efficacy and patient acceptance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 420-428 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Urology |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 7 Jul 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Monitoring
- Prostate cancer
- Treatment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver