Abstract
At a time when there was a perceived civil justice crisis, published in the Modern Law Review of May 1993, was an article written by Simon Roberts, in which he reasserted the importance of party control over dispute processes and their professional management, and between negotiated outcomes and imposed decisions. This article revisits Roberts’ view that the relationship between civil justice and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) (particularly mediation) could be resolved by introducing three models to encourage extra-judicial dispute resolution. The relationship between ADR and civil justice is reassessed and the extent to which these models have been incorporated is evaluated. To understand how civil justice reform in England and Wales has and will affect the way in which those who use the civil justice system engage with it, this article provides analysis of the developing relationship between ADR and the civil justice system and predicts its future direction of travel.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-33 |
| Journal | Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Mar 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- ADR
- Access to justice
- Alternative dispute resolution
- Civil justice
- Mediation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative dispute resolution and civil justice: A relationship resolved?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver