Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Alternative dispute resolution and civil justice: A relationship resolved?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    At a time when there was a perceived civil justice crisis, published in the Modern Law Review of May 1993, was an article written by Simon Roberts, in which he reasserted the importance of party control over dispute processes and their professional management, and between negotiated outcomes and imposed decisions. This article revisits Roberts’ view that the relationship between civil justice and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) (particularly mediation) could be resolved by introducing three models to encourage extra-judicial dispute resolution. The relationship between ADR and civil justice is reassessed and the extent to which these models have been incorporated is evaluated. To understand how civil justice reform in England and Wales has and will affect the way in which those who use the civil justice system engage with it, this article provides analysis of the developing relationship between ADR and the civil justice system and predicts its future direction of travel.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3-33
    JournalArbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management
    Volume88
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Mar 2022

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • ADR
    • Access to justice
    • Alternative dispute resolution
    • Civil justice
    • Mediation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative dispute resolution and civil justice: A relationship resolved?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this