Abstract
Background
Many reports from the UK government and other organisations highlight a need for a plant aware workforce, and some enumerate specific areas of plant science where there is a skills shortage. We have undertaken a systematic analysis of the content of degree programmes that advertise as teaching plant biology to determine if the UK Higher Education (HE) sector is delivering the graduates required to meet the skills gaps reported.
Results
Our data reveals a highly mixed picture of delivery from one to four year courses, modules ranging from ten to forty credits, and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) providing variable information on their websites. Our analysis shows that on average (irrespective of credit) a module covers three subject areas. Most courses have little plant content and plant content is generally taught with other subjects on a module. The most substantial plant specific subject teaching is delivered on eighteen courses we have identified as Plant Science courses.
Conclusion
Overall the UK HE sector is not delivering graduates with the skill set outlined in numerous reports as required to enable food production in a changing climate. Any prospective student (or employer) will find it virtually impossible to determine which degree will deliver the skills they need as there is no plant curriculum offered across the board, and specific information is hidden within module descriptors on websites. If the skills outlined as being essential for the economy and society are truly important then a new approach is required.
Many reports from the UK government and other organisations highlight a need for a plant aware workforce, and some enumerate specific areas of plant science where there is a skills shortage. We have undertaken a systematic analysis of the content of degree programmes that advertise as teaching plant biology to determine if the UK Higher Education (HE) sector is delivering the graduates required to meet the skills gaps reported.
Results
Our data reveals a highly mixed picture of delivery from one to four year courses, modules ranging from ten to forty credits, and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) providing variable information on their websites. Our analysis shows that on average (irrespective of credit) a module covers three subject areas. Most courses have little plant content and plant content is generally taught with other subjects on a module. The most substantial plant specific subject teaching is delivered on eighteen courses we have identified as Plant Science courses.
Conclusion
Overall the UK HE sector is not delivering graduates with the skill set outlined in numerous reports as required to enable food production in a changing climate. Any prospective student (or employer) will find it virtually impossible to determine which degree will deliver the skills they need as there is no plant curriculum offered across the board, and specific information is hidden within module descriptors on websites. If the skills outlined as being essential for the economy and society are truly important then a new approach is required.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 78-90 |
| Journal | JSFA reports |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Feb 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Botany
- Curriculum analysis
- Gap analysis
- Horticulture
- Plant science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of plant science higher education reveals mixed provision which falls short of delivering national priorities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver