Abstract
Background Previous studies have demonstrated that a competing risks model for the prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates has a superior performance than traditional risk scoring methods. The Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts are derived from sonographic estimated fetal weight rather than birthweight because a large proportion of neonates born before term result from pathologic pregnancy. The individualized risk assessment for small for gestational age at midgestation could be the basis of an antenatal plan that aims to improve the management of preterm pregnancies with small for gestational age with minimum resources. Objective This study aimed to stratify subsequent assessments after 24 weeks of gestation based on the estimated risk of delivery of small-for-gestational-age neonates at
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 494.e1-494.e8 |
| Journal | American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
| Volume | 233 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 27 Oct 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2025 |
Keywords
- Estimated fetal weight
- Fetal biometry
- Fetal growth
- Precision medicine
- Small for gestational age
- Stratification
- Uterine artery pulsatility index
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of risk for small for gestational age at midgestation to define subsequent care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver