Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biased interpretation in paranoia and its modification

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background and objectives
    Cognitive models of psychosis implicate interpretation biases as one of the mechanisms involved in the formation and maintenance of symptoms. First we measured the strength of association between interpretation biases and psychosis-relevant traits. Next we manipulated these biases and quantified the effects of doing so on psychosis-relevant outcomes.

    Methods
    Experiment 1 used two measures of interpretation bias in a healthy sample (n = 70). Experiment 2 used a novel cognitive bias modification procedure (CMB-pa) in individuals with moderate trait paranoia (n = 60).

    Results
    Experiment 1 revealed that over a third of the variance in interpretation bias could be explained by the combined effect of trait measures of paranoia/psychosis. In Experiment 2, CBM-pa produced training-congruent changes in the interpretation of new ambiguous information and influenced the interpretation, attribution and distress associated with a real-life social event.

    Limitations
    The potentially confounding effects of elevated anxiety and depression on interpretation bias and the restricted range of outcome measures to assess the wider effects of CBM-pa.

    Conclusions
    These studies are consistent with interpretation biases contributing to the maintenance of paranoia. CBM-pa could next be adapted and evaluated to test its efficacy as a therapeutic intervention.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)101575
    JournalJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
    Volume69
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2020

    Keywords

    • Cognitive bias modification
    • Information processing
    • Interpretation bias
    • Paranoia

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Biased interpretation in paranoia and its modification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this