Comparing diagrammatic recording versus traditional written account of tympanomastoid procedures: completion of a second audit cycle of 25 cases: Our experience

Rahul Kanegaonkar

doi:10.1111/coa.12365|

Comparing diagrammatic recording versus traditional written account of tympanomastoid procedures: completion of a second audit cycle of 25 cases: Our experience

Rahul Kanegaonkar

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	266-269
Journal	Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences
Volume	40
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12365\|
Publication status	Published - 22 Dec 2014

Access to Document

10.1111/coa.12365|

Cite this

@article{6a85da4594d54d9983ea01c5c5c37018,

title = "Comparing diagrammatic recording versus traditional written account of tympanomastoid procedures: completion of a second audit cycle of 25 cases: Our experience",

author = "Rahul Kanegaonkar",

year = "2014",

month = dec,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1111/coa.12365|",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "266--269",

journal = "Clinical Otolaryngology \& Allied Sciences",

publisher = "Blackwell",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing diagrammatic recording versus traditional written account of tympanomastoid procedures: completion of a second audit cycle of 25 cases: Our experience

AU - Kanegaonkar, Rahul

PY - 2014/12/22

Y1 - 2014/12/22

U2 - 10.1111/coa.12365|

DO - 10.1111/coa.12365|

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 266

EP - 269

JO - Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences

JF - Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences

IS - 3

ER -