Abstract
In this paper, I will reflect on my field experience in Syria where I conducted semi-structured interviews as part of my doctorate studies to examine the recently ousted Syrian government’s post-war initiatives to reconstruct the education sector. As a thinking piece, the aim of this paper is to provoke questions about the complexity of conducting qualitative research in a conflict zone and what implications this has for data generation and research ethics. The paper emphasises the central role of reflexivity as a ‘methodological process of learning’ about our development as researchers. It also concludes that there is a need to review current research ethics processes so that they can accommodate the needs of a more diverse body of researchers and research contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Practice: Contemporary Issues in Practitioner Education |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 6 Mar 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Conflict
- Data generation
- Field work
- Qualitative research
- Research ethics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conducting research in a conflict zone: reflective remarks and lessons learned from my field experience in Syria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver