Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Discursive construction of hegemonic masculinity and emphasised femininity in the textbooks of primary education: children’s discursive agency and polysemy of the narratives

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Gender-normative discursive representations in textbooks could have deleterious impacts on pupils’ gender identity development.

    This study sets out to explore the discursive construction of femininity and masculinity in anthology textbooks for primary education and scrutinize children’s sense-making of gender-normative discourses. Grounded in a poststructuralist theorization of gender and Connell’s [(1995). Masculinities. Oxford: Blackwell] theory of masculinities, this qualitative study employs a Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA) to explore the discursive positioning of femininity and masculinity in school manuals. Additionally, semi-structured group interviews were conducted in two Athenian elementary schools with 40 boys and 40 girls, aged 8–10 years old.

    The findings revealed that, in addition to androcentrism, textbooks were overwhelmingly defined by emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity discourses. Analyses of pupils’ accounts demonstrated that the children negotiated normative discourses in idiosyncratic ways, and that boys were less prepared than girls to subvert the anachronistic discourses of gender promoted by textbooks. It was also found that the mother’s employment status may exert a broadening influence on pupils’ understanding of gender.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)50-67
    JournalGender and Education
    Volume33
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2019

    Keywords

    • Education
    • Gender studies
    • School textbooks

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Discursive construction of hegemonic masculinity and emphasised femininity in the textbooks of primary education: children’s discursive agency and polysemy of the narratives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this