Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy of ketogenic metabolic therapy as an adjuvant to the current standard of care in the treatment of glioblastoma: A systematic review of clinical trials

  • Emily McKerill
  • , Joecelyn Kirani Tan
  • , Chethana Krishna Rao
  • , Christian A Linares
  • , Soirindhri Banerjee
  • , Rukhshana Dina Rabbani
  • , Sola Adeleke
  • , Aruni Ghose
  • , Stergios Boussios
    • University of Leeds
    • University of Manchester
    • Queen Mary University of London
    • Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Cancer Centre at Guy's
    • Department of Clinical Oncology
    • King's College London
    • St. Bartholomew's Hospital
    • Department of Research and Innovation
    • Medway NHS Foundation Trust
    • Department of Medical Oncology
    • Ioannina University Hospital
    • Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences
    • University of Ioannina
    • AELIA Organization
    • American College of Thessaloniki
    • School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
    • Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine
    • University of Kent

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Glioblastoma is a diffuse, heterogenous tumour with a poor prognosis as current therapeutic options have limited efficacy. As a result, research aims to explore new treatment options which exploit the hallmarks of cancer. This review aimed to understand the breadth of research considering ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) as an adjuvant to standard therapy. KMT aims to improve overall survival by exploiting the metabolic reprogramming exclusive to neoplastic cells. Preclinical trials show benefits in KMT when used alongside radiotherapy, through increasing anti-tumour effects compared to controls. Literature searches conducted over three databases, in line with PRISMA guidelines, collated studies relevant to KMT and glioblastoma. Six prospective studies and one retrospective study met the inclusion criteria for this review. Data regarding participants, interventions and survival were extracted. Studies included used small numbers of participants, as many aimed to assess the feasibility of larger-scale trials, which increases errors and bias of results. Furthermore, direct comparison between trials was limited due to study heterogeneity, as each trial used differing parameters and diet compositions. As a result, no definitive conclusions could be made. Future studies should use larger cohorts with standardised parameters so results are representative, and comparisons can be made to evaluate efficacy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)49
    Number of pages1
    JournalMedical Oncology
    Volume43
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Adjuvant
    • Glioblastoma
    • efficacy
    • Brain Tumour
    • Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy
    • Humans
    • Brain Neoplasms
    • Clinical Trials as Topic
    • Standard of Care
    • Diet, Ketogenic

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of ketogenic metabolic therapy as an adjuvant to the current standard of care in the treatment of glioblastoma: A systematic review of clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this