Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is assisted dying really a matter for medical regulation?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper considers whether assisted suicide and euthanasia (AS/E) is an area for medical regulation or whether there is a better alternative regulatory mechanism to govern it. Drawing from empirical evidence across a range of jurisdictions where it is legalized, the paper argues that there are at least four good reasons to consider demedicalizing AS/E: 1) pragmatic ethical issues of infrastructural weakness in AS/E service provision in already overstretched healthcare systems globally; 2) challenges of medicalization; 3) regulatory complexities concerning medical law (including pharmaceutical law) and criminal law; 4) the risk that AS/E becomes more easily susceptible to healthcare economics. The paper suggests several recommendations concerning a possible ‘demedicalized model.’
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
    Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2025

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
    2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • Assisted dying
    • Medicalisation
    • Pharmaceuticalisation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is assisted dying really a matter for medical regulation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this