Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Manual mapping of drumlins in synthetic landscapes to assess operator effectiveness

  • Katie Wooldridge
  • , M.J. Smith
  • , R. Armugam
  • , I. Barr
  • , C.M. Boston
  • , C.D. Clark
  • , J. Ely
  • , A. Frankl
  • , S.L. Greenwood
  • , L. Gosselin
  • , C. Hättestrand
  • , K. Hogan
  • , A.L.C. Hughes
  • , S.J. Livingstone
  • , H. Lovell
  • , M. McHenry
  • , Y. Munoz
  • , X.M. Pellicer
  • , R. Pellitero
  • , C. Robb
  • S. Roberson, D. Ruther, M. Spagnolo, M. Standell, C.R. Stokes, R. Storrar, N.J. Tate, J.K. Hillier

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    39 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Mapped topographic features are important for understanding processes that sculpt the Earth's surface. This paper presents maps that are the primary product of an exercise that brought together 27 researchers with an interest in landform mapping wherein the efficacy and causes of variation in mapping were tested using novel synthetic DEMs containing drumlins. The variation between interpreters (e.g. mapping philosophy, experience) and across the study region (e.g. woodland prevalence) opens these factors up to assessment. A priori known answers in the synthetics increase the number and strength of conclusions that may be drawn with respect to a traditional comparative study. Initial results suggest that overall detection rates are relatively low (34–40%), but reliability of mapping is higher (72–86%). The maps form a reference dataset.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)719-729
    JournalJournal of Maps
    Volume11
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • Drumlins, manual mapping, DEMs

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Manual mapping of drumlins in synthetic landscapes to assess operator effectiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this