Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Motivators and demotivators to accessing malaria in pregnancy interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-ethnographic review

  • Matilda Aberese-Ako
  • , Phidelia Doegah
  • , Evelyn Acquah
  • , Pascal Magnussen
  • , Evelyn Ansah
  • , Gifty Ampofo
  • , Dominic Dankwah Agyei
  • , Desmond Klu
  • , Elsie Mottey
  • , Julie Balen
  • , Safiatou Doumbo
  • , Wilfred Mbacham
  • , Ouma Gaye
  • , Margaret Gyapong
  • , Seth Owusu-Agyei
  • , Harry Tagbor
  • University of Health and Allied Sciences
  • University of Copenhagen
  • School of Health and Related Research-ScHARR
  • The University of Sheffield
  • University of Horticultural Sciences
  • University of Yaounde I
  • University Cheikh Anta Diop Dakar

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the introduction of efficacious interventions for malaria control, sub-Saharan Africa continues to bear the highest burden of malaria and its associated effects on vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women and children. This meta-ethnographic review contributes to literature on malaria in pregnancy interventions in sub-Saharan Africa by offering insights into the multiple factors that motivate or demotivate women from accessing MiP interventions.

METHODS: A meta-ethnographic approach was used for the synthesis. Original qualitative research articles published from 2010 to November 2021 in English in sub-Saharan Africa were searched for. Articles focusing on WHO's recommended interventions such as intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, long-lasting insecticidal nets and testing and treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy (MiP) were included. Selected articles were uploaded into Nvivo 11 for thematic coding and synthesis.

RESULTS: Twenty-seven original qualitative research articles were included in the analysis. Main factors motivating uptake of MiP interventions were: (1) well organized ANC, positive attitudes of health workers and availability of MiP services; (2) Women's knowledge of the effects of malaria in pregnancy, previous experience of accessing responsive ANC; (3) financial resources and encouragement from partners, relatives and friends and (4) favourable weather condition and nearness to a health facility. Factors that demotivated women from using MiP services were: (1) stock-outs, ANC charges and health providers failure to provide women with ample education on the need for MiP care; (2) perception of not being at risk and the culture of self-medication; (3) fear of being bewitched if pregnancy was noticed early, women's lack of decision-making power and dependence on traditional remedies and (4) warm weather, long distances to health facilities and the style of construction of houses making it difficult to hang LLINs.

CONCLUSIONS: Health system gaps need to be strengthened in order to ensure that MiP interventions become accessible to women. Additionally, health managers need to involve communities in planning, designing and implementing malaria interventions for pregnant women. It is important that the health system engage extensively with communities to facilitate pregnant women and communities understanding of MiP interventions and the need to support pregnant women to access them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170
JournalMalaria Journal
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Africa South of the Sahara
  • Antimalarials/therapeutic use
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Malaria/drug therapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic/prevention & control
  • Pregnant People

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Motivators and demotivators to accessing malaria in pregnancy interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-ethnographic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this