Abstract
Context matters. Therefore, efforts to develop greater conceptual clarity are important for science and practice. In this commentary, we outline some key issues that were prompted by Squire's et al.'s contribution. Specifically, we reinforce context as an interactive concept and therefore something that is hard to 'pin down', the problematic nature of conceptualising context in implementation and de-implementation, and a requirement for the development of culturally sensitive understandings. Finally, we suggest it is vital that continued investment into providing a more comprehensive list of determinants needs to be accompanied by an equal effort in developing practical methods and tools to support use and application. [Abstract copyright: © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.]
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2365-2367 |
| Journal | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Aug 2022 |
Keywords
- Complexity
- Concept Formation
- Context
- De-implementation
- Humans
- Implementation
- Knowledge Translation
- Theory
- Translational Science, Biomedical
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Optimising the Conceptualisation of Context Comment on "Stakeholder Perspectives of Attributes and Features of Context Relevant to Knowledge Translation in Health Settings: A Multi-country Analysis".'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver