Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Playing by the many rules: taught masters and their assessment regulations

  • Shaun Le Boutillier
  • , Cathi Fredricks
  • , Harvey Woolf
  • , Marie Stowell
  • , Jo Coward
  • , Graham Taylor-Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In recent years the taught masters course has become an even more important component of the curriculum portfolio for universities in the UK and elsewhere. In the spring of 2021, the Student Assessment and Classification Working Group (SACWG) surveyed a small number of English and Welsh universities to compare assessment regulations for taught masters courses. The survey revealed substantial differences in the use and application of rules between institutions. The issue of divergence and convergence of the principles on which assessment rules are based was discussed further at a SACWG seminar that took place the following year. At this event, participants took part in a thought experiment that required them to set aside any prior application of assessment regulations and to attempt to agree on the rules for taught masters courses. These group discussions provided a high degree of openness and positivity. We discuss the results of the survey, the seminar and the experiment. We consider, also, the benefits of generating an open dialogue that aims to increase consistency of practice and understanding of the educational value of key assessment rules in higher education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1035-1047
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume49
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Assessment regulations
  • Student achievement
  • Taught masters courses

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Playing by the many rules: taught masters and their assessment regulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this