Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Policy processes sans frontières: interactions in transnational governance of global health

  • The London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Regroupement stratégique Politiques publiques et santé des populations
  • Université du Québec à Montréal
  • University of Montreal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

National policy on global health (NPGH) arenas are multisectoral governing arrangements for cooperation between health, development, and foreign affairs sectors in government policy for global health governance. To explore the relationship between national and global processes for governing global health, this paper asks: in what forms of interaction between NPGH arenas and global health governance are learning and networking processes present? In a multiple case study of Norwegian and Swiss NPGH arenas, we collected data on intersectoral policy processes from semi-structured interviews with 33 informants in 2014-2015. Adapting Real-Dato’s framework, we analyzed each case separately, producing monographs for comparing NPGH arenas. Analyzing both NPGH arenas for relational structures linking external resources to internal policy arena processes, we found five zones of interactions - including institutions, transgovernmental clubs, and connective forms. These interactions circulate ideas and soften arenas’ boundaries. We argue that NPGH is characteristic of transnational governance of global health.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-180
Number of pages20
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Boundary spanning
  • Elite networking
  • Global health governance
  • Interaction
  • Intersectoral policy processes
  • National policy on global health
  • Policy learning
  • Transnational governance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Policy processes sans frontières: interactions in transnational governance of global health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this