Abstract
Objectives:
The main objective of this study was to develop and evaluate an anti-doping intervention aiming to reduce athletes’ intentions to dope by targeting their moral disengagement, anticipated guilt, and self-regulatory efficacy. Design: 2 Group (Psychological, Educational) x 2 Time (Pre, Post) Experimental design, with a two-month follow up.
Methods:
Athletes (N= 206) from individual and team sports, recruited from Greece and UK, were randomly assigned to either a psychological (n= 95) or an educational intervention (n= 112). The psychological intervention focused on challenging moral disengagement mechanisms, accentuating anticipated guilt and strengthening self-regulatory efficacy to resist doping. The educational intervention included information about anti-doping rules and regulations, health consequences of banned substances, sport supplements, and healthy nutrition. Both interventions consisted of six, one-hour sessions. Athletes completed questionnaires about doping intention, moral disengagement, selfregulatory efficacy, and guilt pre and post intervention, and two months after the end of the intervention.
Results:
Analysis showed a decrease in doping intention and moral disengagement from pre to post test for both the psychological and the educational intervention. Self-regulatory efficacy increased for those participants taking part in the educational but not those taking part in the psychological intervention.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that our anti-doping interventions can be effective in reducing doping intentions. The findings have significant implications for anti-doping and can inform both policy and practice.
The main objective of this study was to develop and evaluate an anti-doping intervention aiming to reduce athletes’ intentions to dope by targeting their moral disengagement, anticipated guilt, and self-regulatory efficacy. Design: 2 Group (Psychological, Educational) x 2 Time (Pre, Post) Experimental design, with a two-month follow up.
Methods:
Athletes (N= 206) from individual and team sports, recruited from Greece and UK, were randomly assigned to either a psychological (n= 95) or an educational intervention (n= 112). The psychological intervention focused on challenging moral disengagement mechanisms, accentuating anticipated guilt and strengthening self-regulatory efficacy to resist doping. The educational intervention included information about anti-doping rules and regulations, health consequences of banned substances, sport supplements, and healthy nutrition. Both interventions consisted of six, one-hour sessions. Athletes completed questionnaires about doping intention, moral disengagement, selfregulatory efficacy, and guilt pre and post intervention, and two months after the end of the intervention.
Results:
Analysis showed a decrease in doping intention and moral disengagement from pre to post test for both the psychological and the educational intervention. Self-regulatory efficacy increased for those participants taking part in the educational but not those taking part in the psychological intervention.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that our anti-doping interventions can be effective in reducing doping intentions. The findings have significant implications for anti-doping and can inform both policy and practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
| Event | Division of Sport and Exercise Psychology Annual Conference 2018 - Duration: 3 Dec 2018 → … |
Conference
| Conference | Division of Sport and Exercise Psychology Annual Conference 2018 |
|---|---|
| Period | 3/12/18 → … |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Preventing doping in sport: the VIRTUES project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver