Statutory annexation of covenants: A practical solution built on unstable foundations

Matthew Stubbins

Statutory annexation of covenants: A practical solution built on unstable foundations

Matthew Stubbins

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Controversial from its publication, Federated Homes v Mills Lodge has received support for its creation of “statutory annexation”, and strong criticism for the theoretical foundation provided. This article seeks to interrogate the theoretical foundations of Federated Homes, before identifying its subsequent judicial treatment and whether there are policy justifications supporting statutory annexation’s existence.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	284-304
Journal	Conveyancer and Property Lawyer
Volume	86
Issue number	3
Publication status	Published - 26 Sept 2022

Keywords

Annexation
Benefits of covenants
Restrictive covenants

Access to Document

M Stubbins_ Statutory Annexation of Covenants - A Practical Solution Built on Unstable Foundations - C&PL_NR Revised.pdfFinal published version, 256 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{6feaf4df14034b27ae6bea31c6c2e9a8,

title = "Statutory annexation of covenants: A practical solution built on unstable foundations",

abstract = "Controversial from its publication, Federated Homes v Mills Lodge has received support for its creation of “statutory annexation”, and strong criticism for the theoretical foundation provided. This article seeks to interrogate the theoretical foundations of Federated Homes, before identifying its subsequent judicial treatment and whether there are policy justifications supporting statutory annexation{\textquoteright}s existence.",

keywords = "Annexation, Benefits of covenants, Restrictive covenants",

author = "Matthew Stubbins",

year = "2022",

month = sep,

day = "26",

language = "English",

volume = "86",

pages = "284--304",

journal = "Conveyancer and Property Lawyer",

issn = "0010-8200",

publisher = "Sweet \& Maxwell",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statutory annexation of covenants: A practical solution built on unstable foundations

AU - Stubbins, Matthew

PY - 2022/9/26

Y1 - 2022/9/26

N2 - Controversial from its publication, Federated Homes v Mills Lodge has received support for its creation of “statutory annexation”, and strong criticism for the theoretical foundation provided. This article seeks to interrogate the theoretical foundations of Federated Homes, before identifying its subsequent judicial treatment and whether there are policy justifications supporting statutory annexation’s existence.

AB - Controversial from its publication, Federated Homes v Mills Lodge has received support for its creation of “statutory annexation”, and strong criticism for the theoretical foundation provided. This article seeks to interrogate the theoretical foundations of Federated Homes, before identifying its subsequent judicial treatment and whether there are policy justifications supporting statutory annexation’s existence.

KW - Annexation

KW - Benefits of covenants

KW - Restrictive covenants

M3 - Article

SN - 0010-8200

VL - 86

SP - 284

EP - 304

JO - Conveyancer and Property Lawyer

JF - Conveyancer and Property Lawyer

IS - 3

ER -