Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Commission on Religious Education – A response to L. Philip Barnes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In a recent article, L. Philip Barnes critiques the Commission on Religious Education (CoRE) Final Report by scrutinising its text and by responding to my interpretation of that text. His particular, but not exclusive, focus is CoRE’s proposal that the idea of worldview should be central to RE. His conclusion is that: ‘The collective force of these criticisms counsels against implementing the proposals of CoRE. Religious education needs to look elsewhere than to a worldview curriculum to overcome its current travails’. This article responds by arguing that Barnes fails to justify his conclusion because his critique does not meet the standards of a fair and responsible treatment of his chosen focal texts. In particular, it misrepresents and misinterprets the CoRE Report and overlooks the alternative interpretation that I and others offered.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Studies
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Commission on RE (CoRE)
  • Interpretation
  • L. Philip Barnes
  • Religious education
  • Worldview

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Commission on Religious Education – A response to L. Philip Barnes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this