Abstract
Suicidology, the scientific study of suicide and suicide prevention, constructs suicide as primarily a question of individual mental health. Despite recent engagement with suicide from a broader public health perspective, and efforts of critical suicide studies scholars and activists to widen the disciplinary and theoretical base of suicidology, the narrow focus on individual pathology and deficit in conceptualising suicide persists. In this article, I consider the ways in which this ‘psychocentric’ knowledge of suicide is produced and organised, offer reasons why this to be problematic, and outline other available forms of knowledge production. This knowledge production is psychopolitical rather than psychocentric that emphasises much more the contexts (political, economic, social, cultural and historical) within which suicide occurs. Psychopolitical analysis aims to better understand the complex social and political contexts of such deaths, and, ultimately, seeks to open up collective and political possibilities for action which are denied when suicide is conceptualised solely as an issue of individual mental health.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 544-554 |
| Journal | Social Epistemology |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 5 Mar 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Critical suicide studies
- Psychocentric knowledge
- Suicide
- Suicide prevention
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The social production of psychocentric knowledge in suicidology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver