Abstract
This essay suggests that Machiavelli's claim that the moral vice of hypocrisy is inescapable in politics constitutes a real issue for democratic politics today. Indeed, it concludes that democratic societies are implicated in creating the impetus to hypocritical behaviour. The essay questions the prevalent conviction that a liberal democratic polity should be premised on transparency and candour, not on hypocritical manipulation – a conviction which is paradoxically shared by the dirty hands thesis which is mostly owed to Michael Walzer and which purportedly takes Machiavelli's insights on the moral messiness of politics seriously. Attempts to deny the necessity of political hypocrisy misconstrue the realities of democratic politics – the messy context in which politicians operate and what is distinctive of political friendships. Democratic politicians operate in a context ridden with conflict and dependence which renders hypocrisy a necessary political virtue and one of the strings that hold together a virtuous political life.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Journal | Contemporary Politics |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 26 Nov 2015 |
Keywords
- Machiavelli, hypocrisy, political virtue, moral conflict, democratic politics, dirty hands
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The virtue of vice: a defence of hypocrisy in democratic politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver