Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validity and Reliability of Using a Belt-Worn Accelerometer on the Lower Back to Monitor Physical Activity

  • School of Medicine and Biosciences, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK
  • School of Allied Health and Life Sciences, London South Bank University, Southwark, London SE1 0AA, UK

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study evaluated the validity and reliability of physical activity measurements collected using a belt-mounted accelerometer worn at the lumbar spine. The study consisted of two parts, with 10 healthy participants in each part. In part 1, physical activity measurements collected from a belt-mounted accelerometer were compared with that from a skin-mounted accelerometer during controlled exercises and free-living activities, with both accelerometers worn simultaneously at the same anatomical location. In part 2 physical activity measurements in controlled exercises were compared between two different days, with either the belt-mounted accelerometer or skin-mounted accelerometer worn singularly. The results demonstrated no significant difference in physical activity measurements between either mounting method, or between the two testing days during controlled activities. These results indicate that the belt-mounting method is valid and has good day-to-day reliability and can be used in studies requiring long-term data collection to assess the impact of physical activity-related rehabilitation and low back pain.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429
JournalSensors
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2026

Keywords

  • Accelerometers
  • Physical activity
  • Measurement
  • Validation study
  • Methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity and Reliability of Using a Belt-Worn Accelerometer on the Lower Back to Monitor Physical Activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this