Abstract
Are certain forms of government associated with superior economic outcomes? This paper attempts to answer that question by examining how government systems influence macroeconomic performance. We find that presidential regimes consistently are associated with less favorable outcomes than parliamentary regimes: slower output growth, higher and more volatile inflation and greater income inequality. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect is sizable. For example, annual output growth is between 0.6 and 1.2 percentage points lower and inflation is estimated to be at least four percentage points higher under presidential regimes relative to those under parliamentary ones.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 361-387 |
| Journal | Public Choice |
| Volume | 176 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2 May 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Constitutional economics; form of government; economic growth; inflation; income inequality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Who does better for the economy? Presidents versus parliamentary democracies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver