Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Why metaphysics matters for the science-theology debate – an incarnational case study

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article examines the relationship between science and theology within a critical realist framework. Focusing on the role of metaphysics as a unifying starting point, especially in consideration of theological issues that are concerned with corporeality and temporality (such as in the incarnation). Some metaphysical challenges that lead to the appearance of “paradox” in the incarnation are highlighted, and the implications of two forms of holistic scientific ontology on the appearance of a paradox in the incarnation are explored. It is concluded that ultimately both science and theology are concerned with the nature of reality, and the search for coherent models that can describe the unseen. Whilst one should maintain a criticality to any realist conception of theological and scientific theories, a shared metaphysics ensures theological doctrine can continue to be interpreted with relevance in a world in which scientific thought is increasingly stretching into the meta-scientific.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)125-155
    JournalStudia Philosophiae Christianae
    Volume56
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2020

    Keywords

    • Critical realism
    • Paradox
    • Science
    • Theology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why metaphysics matters for the science-theology debate – an incarnational case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this